legislating, regulating and incentivizing or de-incentivizing affections and relationships, both sides of the argument make a legally justifiable case. The question of whether government should make such matters its jurisdiction is a good one—but government has already done so, for better or for worse (for worse, I believe). And once marriage and marital status becomes the concern of the state, there are implications—not just for the same-sex debate (which is a question rightfully engaged if the
Pages 91–92